Tuesday, February 24, 2015

PICTORAL.


This picture, in essence, summarizes the biggest issue with Net Neutrality as it stands right now -- and that problem is that it is a split issue in Congress.
Typically, Republicans vote against Net Neutrality while those for it line with the Democrats.
This shouldn't be an issue of politics, but given how intertwined with business the American political system is, it is.

DIARY ENTRY.

February 22nd, 2015.
Okay, okay, okay.
I know this is supposed to be about my project.
Thing is.
Only you are going to see this blog, so I figure I can be a teensy bit liberal with what goes here.
It can be our little secret.
: )
Anyway, I have to admit I had a lot of trouble doing things for this project.
Not that I don't have a concrete stand on Net Neutrality -- you know what it is.
Or not enough knowledge on the subject.
I could talk at you for hours about the various business sins Comcast has committed in the past year let alone in their entire history.
This is an English persuasive project.
It's supposed to get you on my side.
I feel like I probably already did that the moment you started reading this blog.
Of course you'd want to agree with me, right?
Well.
I had a gasping thought a few days ago.
Why don't we just boycott businesses that are unsupportive of Net Neutrality?
I thought hard about it.
Boycotting is practically the next American dream these days.
Don't like something? BOYCOTT!
Problem is, nothing is accomplished by boycotting besides using economically violent tactics to disavow those that don't agree with us.
That's why we have to educate the big wigs that sit in their high rise condos in NYC just how much opposing net neutrality would harm them in the long term.
Because showing a man the merit to a right than punishing for a wrong has three times the impact.

GUIDELINES FOR HOW TO APPRECIATE YOUR "FREE" INTERNET.

( officially sponsered by the Kaylas for a Better Internet Commission! )

What are your daily activities over the Internet?
Blogging, texting, calling, writing angry posts about the evils of Comcast (proudly guilty!),  completely forgetting about the need to read a book over break (not so proudly guilty!), and just generally enjoying a world full of connections?
If so, great! You are officially protected with your interests under Net Neutrality! -- which is awesome, by the way.
So why do companies want to take away those liberties?
It's a complex question to ask, but here are some guidelines to better appreciate your Internet while fighting for the sake of Net Neutrality being upheld by the FCC:

  1. Post, don't just relate! The world needs your voice and your opinion. It's what makes the Internet the Internet.
  2. Stay informed! There's nothing worse than a case of terrible misinformation to crudely sway you to any one side -- but this is obviously a pro-Net Neutrality blog.
  3. Peruse everything you can find about the topic! There are so many fascinating things going on with the Internet, and how unique it is in comparison to any other media system currently in existence today.
  4. News about the standard of Net Neutrality comes in almost every day! Just this month, the FCC announced their planned reforms for their regulations, including rebranding the Internet as a communications service.
  5. And finally ... Be involved! Net Neutrality is quite possibly the biggest debate that will perhaps be answered in 2015.

Sunday, February 22, 2015

ADVERTISEMENT.

Hey, YOU!
Yes, YOU! The person sitting right here! The person reading these letters and words! YOU!
How would YOU like to sign up for the wonderful, most stupendous, greatest ever ...
NET NEUTRAL INTERNET?!
Just think about it! You'll have fair pricing, fair coverage, actually usable customer service that doesn't blatantly lie to you (thanks, Comcast), and most of all...
... UN-THROTTLED SERVICE!
Now you won't have to count your lucky stars whenever you're able to get Netflix to stream properly, listen to the music you like on Spotify, being able to access any webpage you so desire at blazing fast speeds!
But there is a caveat.
One, tiny, little, microscopic caveat.
Net neutral Internet is at STAKE!
You could see a world haunted by throttled Internet forcing you to divulge your news from FOX News, a place where you must buy everything and anything from Amazon (even when it's cheaper on camelcamelcamel), and so many more Internet HORRORS!
How do we stop this from happening?!
Write to your local senator to uphold the FCC's ruling on Net Neutrality today!
THE FATE OF THE INTERNET IS IN YOUR HANDS!

A KINGLY DEBATE.

There is something I haven't delved into yet, and something I should discuss.

I should discuss it, yes. But the answers -- up to you; this is a debate, after all. It requires you, and it requires me. I already have my answers -- that isn't the point. But what are yours?

1. What do you think of Comcast? Have you even heard of them before this?

2. Comcast aside, which Internet Service Provider do you pay for?

3. How would you rate their service? Any outages?

4. How do you think the Net Neutrality ruling by the FCC might affect your browsing of the Internet or even your monthly bill?

5. What's your stance on Net Neutrality? For, against, completely ambivalent?

These are all good questions. You can answer them in the comment section below when you read this. We can talk about it in-class too.

Thursday, February 12, 2015

SOME COMMENTARY.

The world is boasted by its seemingly infinite share of cosmic irony.

Recently, and by "this month recent", the 'good fight' in the name of net neutrality has reached a breakthrough. Tom Wheeler, resident misled head of the Federal Communications Comission, has finally decided enough is enough of relentlessly pandering to Internet Service Providers and is currently spearheading changes to their policies that would redefine providing Internet service a "telecommunications service" instead of an "information service."

How influential is this decision?

To put it kindly, enormous. (1)

By classifying the Internet, and allowing access therein to the Internet a telecommunications service, Internet Service Providers are now "common carriers" in legalese, that meaning they fall under the same policies for other common carriers which is a huge step towards net neutrality being enforced. (2) 

Who wants this to happen? Us.

Who doesn't want this to happen? Go on, gander a guess.

And it's not just Comcast.

All of the big names are opposed to this decision in some way or another - AT&T, Verizon, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, et al. Tom Wheeler, on the other hands, is particularly adamant that he isn't going to pay the lobbyists -- or the bribes -- any heed in his pending decision with the FCC, which is set to reach its final decision late this Feburary.

For the rest of us, we can only wait in quiet trepidation that all will be well.

Tuesday, February 10, 2015

AN OPEN LETTER TO COMCAST'S CEO.

Oh dearest Brain Roberts(1),

May I suggest something to you, One and Glorious of the Comcastian Internet Empire(2)? I dare not offer a challenge to your mighty autocracy of cable among us here in the US of A - that would be only left to the foolish and the shortsighted. No, no, I will do away with all that. Consider this, your Glory, a most honest, a most truncated and straightforward collective opinion of your peoples in your vast swathes of dominion on the basis of your rule.

Your people despise you.(3)

Now, now, I can see it your eyes. I tell you, your Glory, to not be infuriated. I am but a most beset messenger, whose words scathe me to hear them come forth from I as much as it scathes you. I give you a simple resolve, more a placid suggestion, to help curtail the ignorance of your peoples in this manner. You own so much(4), your Glory, in terms of land and your cables, to connect this country with the gift, yes, the most valued gift of your Internet. It is troubling to those that consider it a tyranny,(5) an injustice on this free-bearing nation that you own so much. It gives you freedom to be benevolent, they affirm, but also the freedom to be no more than a sacrilaged dictator of prices and vanquished competition. 


Beyond that, your Glory, it also happens that you are almost unanimously voted the worst company in America by the heresy of Consumerist(6) this previous year - heresy that I do admit is fairly popular among your peoples. Because of the prevalence of freedom of speech, much like your freedom to dictate, we cannot simply be rid of Consumerist and its heresy, not quite; perhaps at another time, but their voice must be considered with the influence it has on your peons. Then I say, your Glory, that consumer value has more merit to it than previously decided.

Your peons' voice in these affairs, of what they so demand from you, your Glory, is becoming fairly clear, is it not? They wish for a land of options between their Internet Service Providers, a tested freedom from price gouging and anti-competitive leverage(7) and then too the ability to have genuine customer service without it becoming a paraded about "horror story" among the analogues of Consumerist and other sites of heresy to your rule. And, too, a freedom of being able to access what they wish on your Internet that you so graciously provide. A suggestion it may, but a suggestion I do believe is very much warranted.

Sincerely,
A Consumer of Verizon FiOS

Footnotes:
(1): Edwards, Haley Sweetland. "The Man Who Wants To Remake The Internet Does Not Wear A Hoodie." (par. 1)
(2): Edwards, Haley Sweetland. "The Man Who Wants To Remake The Internet Does Not Wear A Hoodie." (par. 3)
(3): Edwards, Haley Sweetland. "The Man Who Wants To Remake The Internet Does Not Wear A Hoodie." (par. 7)
(4): Edwards, Haley Sweetland. "The Man Who Wants To Remake The Internet Does Not Wear A Hoodie." (par. 3)
(5): Edwards, Haley Sweetland. "The Man Who Wants To Remake The Internet Does Not  Wear A Hoodie." (par. 4)
(6): http://consumerist.com/2014/04/08/congratulations-to-comcast-your-2014-worst-company-in-america/
(7): Edwards, Haley Sweetland. "The Man Who Wants To Remake The Internet Does Not  Wear A Hoodie." (par. 17)